The Torino Process monitoring draws on multiple, often disparate, information sources and data. To facilitate a quick, efficient, and focused communication of key messages despite the diversity of information collected, the reporting of monitoring results aggregates the evidence in ways which facilitate a quick overview of system performance without sacrificing too much detail.
The eight monitoring dimensions mentioned in the previous section are the top layer of reporting in this respect. They capture VET system performance in various domains, the selection of which is aligned with national and international country commitments and reform and development priorities concerning learning. These eight dimensions are described as follows:
FIGURE 1. DIMENSIONS OF POLICY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MONITORING THROUGH THE TORINO PROCESS
This section of the monitoring report presents the system performance of Morocco in the eight dimensions of monitoring. The findings suggest that in terms of overall performance, lifelong learners in the country are likely to benefit from education and training which is very invested in the promotion of innovative practices and results in various domains of VET system delivery in a system which does not hesitate to embark on innovative solutions in these domains (Figure 1). With an SPI of 72 points for innovation, Morocco is above the average for other systems monitored by the Torino Process with promoting innovative practices and priorities.
However, these benefits do not seem to be readily accessible to all learners in the same way. Morocco scores higher on access and attractiveness in international comparison, but nationally, compared to other dimensions of system performance, VET underperforms (SPI of 38). Learners who nevertheless manage to join a learning opportunity through VET are not guaranteed to also participate in that learning successfully, as the completion of their learning and especially the transition to another learning opportunity may pose a challenge. In fact, participation in learning is the weakest domain of system performance, both compared to other domains in focus of monitoring and especially in international comparison where the SPI of Morocco (45 points) is lower than that of other countries in the sample (67 points) (Figure 1). The underlying reasons for these results are discussed in Section 2.2.1.
FIGURE 2. INDEX OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE BY MONITORING DIMENSION,
MOROCCO AND INTERNATIONAL AVERAGE (2023)
Theoretical[5] The Torino Process makes a distinction between theoretical index range and index range used for reporting purposes. For reporting purposes, rare instances of extreme values on the low end (SPI < 10) and on the high end (SPI>90) of the index scale are truncated at the upper (10) and lower (90) decile end. This means that the reporting does not discriminate SPI values below 10 and above 90.
index range: min/low performance=0, max/high performance=100
Source: Torino Process monitoring database
It is worthwhile noting that, despite somewhat uneven results across monitoring dimensions, the steering, management, and resourcing of the IVET and CVET subsystems are deemed to be among the best-performing domains of VET performance in the country. The adequacy and efficiency of human and financial resource allocation and use are the best domain of performance with a SPI of 74, at least according to official interpretation. This is high in international comparison and may merit further exploration as the perceptions from practitioners in the VET system seem to differ, pointing towards staff and material shortages as factors hindering their capacity to provide instruction.[6] Source: ETF KIESE database and OECD PISA 2018 database.
Without implying causality, this aligns with the lower performance score of Morocco regarding the ability of its VET system to provide skills and competences of sufficient relevance and quality. The SPI of Morocco in this dimension of system performance is 58, which is significantly less than the international average of 66.
The next sections of this report dive deeper into the monitoring evidence for Morocco to explain these monitoring results by presenting more granular information about the performance of the VET system in specific domains of policy and system delivery.