Lebanon 2024
Key takeaways
In Lebanon, initial VET is accessible in both rural and urban areas but struggles to attract learners due to its negative reputation. Many families view it as a pathway for low-performing students, which discourages wider participation. Continuing VET remains underdeveloped, with limited funding and availability, and few adult learners are able to access further training. Transitions to university are possible but rare, as many VET students face learning difficulties and risk dropping out. Public VET schools also lack remedial and dropout-prevention support.
Delivering basic skills and key competences is a persistent challenge. Students in Lebanon’s VET system lag three to four years behind international benchmarks in reading, science, and mathematics. Outcomes vary by background and location, with disadvantaged learners in public VET particularly affected. Many enter with weak foundational skills and receive little support to improve. Adult education performs slightly better but still falls short in areas like languages, soft skills, and digital literacy.
Lebanon has improved its ability to monitor VET and performs better than many countries in the Torino Process on data availability. External stakeholders play an active role in shaping policy, and quality assurance processes are in place. However, international engagement is limited, and infrastructure and training materials remain outdated. Despite stable funding, inefficiencies and the financial crisis have deepened existing resource shortages. Renewed investment and stronger support for learners are needed to improve system performance.
Access to learning
Monitoring in the area of access to and participation to learning helps countries assess the extent to which initial VET, continuing VET and other learning opportunities are accessible and attractive to all learners, regardless of their individual backgrounds or reasons for participating. The data also reflects how well learners can expect to progress through and graduate from these learning opportunities.
The Torino Process is a regular review of national systems of vocational education and training as well as adult education. It is designed to analyse the ways in which national VET systems (including adult education) address the challenges of human capital development in a lifelong learning perspective. It was established by the European Training Foundation (ETF) in 2010 and has been carried out in partner countries in Southeastern Europe, Turkey, Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean ever since.
Monitoring in the context of the Torino Process describes the extent to which countries deliver on their commitments to learners in support of their learning through life (lifelong learning - LLL) in three major areas of policy and system performance: access to learning, quality of learning, and system organisation.
Quality of learning
Quality and relevance of learning is the area of monitoring that identifies how successfully the VET system provides basic skills and key competences to both young and adult learners. It highlights the relevance of VET programmes to the world of work and how effectively VET graduates transition into the labour market. Additionally, it monitors efforts to promote excellence across key domains, including pedagogy, professional development, programme content, governance, and social inclusion, as well as the openness of the VET system to innovation in response to the evolving needs of learners and labour markets.
In 2024, students in Lebanon’s VET continue to face serious challenges in basic skills, with large learning gaps shaped by socioeconomic inequality. The system struggles to provide relevant, future-oriented training, particularly in digital skills and work-based learning. Adult education performs slightly better but still falls short of expectations. Career guidance and environmental education are areas of strength, but broader curriculum reform, stronger support for disadvantaged learners, and greater focus on future skills will be essential to modernise and strengthen VET in Lebanon.
System organisation
System organisation is the area of monitoring that captures performance across various domains of management and administration. It examines whether practitioners and leaders have access to data and evidence to support informed decision-making, the level of stakeholder involvement in VET governance, the quality and capacity of staff in leadership positions, and the degree of internationalisation. Additionally, monitoring the allocation of human and financial resources to the VET system helps assess whether these resources effectively support teaching, training, and learning.
Lebanon has made progress in monitoring its VET system and performs better than many countries in the Torino Process on data collection. However, uneven data availability still limits its use in guiding policy and improvement. School-level leadership needs strengthening, and international cooperation remains underdeveloped. While financial resources are in place, infrastructure and learning materials are lagging behind. Improving facilities, investing in staff, and building international partnerships will be essential to making VET more effective, resilient, and responsive to learner and labour market needs.
Promoting access and participation in opportunities for lifelong learning
Supporting quality and relevance of lifelong learning
Index of system performance
International comparability of performance results
In addition to assessing system performance, the Torino Process also looks at how internationally comparable the results of each country are, how much they may be affected by bias, and how critically countries assess their own systems when reporting for external monitoring. This is possible because the methodology keeps track of the availability, source, and type of evidence used to generate the results of each country - including for Lebanon.
In 2024, Lebanon ranks among the top quarter of countries in the Torino Process in terms of the amount of internationally comparable data reported, and this has improved since 2023. The country meets more of the required international indicators than most others in the sample. However, only about one in four of its monitoring results is based on quantitative evidence, which increases the risk of bias. In other words, while some areas are well supported by data, others still lack sufficient evidence. Despite these limitations, national authorities in Lebanon tend to take a balanced view when assessing system performance. Their self-assessments are generally neutral – neither overly critical nor overly positive – which helps maintain the credibility of the reporting process.