Georgia 2023
Key takeaways
VET in Georgia is quite accessible for young learners. The system of initial VET (IVET) is also supportive of their progression and successful graduation. Unlike in many other countries, VET is considered an attractive option compared to other educational paths. It is relatively straightforward for young learners to move from one level or stage of education to the next, such as from a basic to an advanced course within the same field. However, if a learner wants to switch to a different but related field, such as moving from one VET programme to another, the system is not as flexible. Another area in need of attention is adult education. Adults struggle to access learning: continuing VET (CVET) and other lifelong learning opportunities are limited due to a shortage of available spots despite increasing demand.
The VET system of Georgia effectively connects learning with the world of work, fostering strong links between VET institutions and the labour market. This helps develop skills and competencies that align with employer needs. However, the strong engagement between VET institutions and the labour market does not seem to lead to higher employability rates after graduation. Additionally, access to information about professions and education programmes is somewhat lacking, which could be affecting employment outcomes. The VET system shows promise in adapting to digitalisation, but it could place more focus on supporting the green transition.
The organisation of VET in Georgia has a mix of strengths and weaknesses across different areas. VET institutions are skilled at tracking and evaluating their own performance to ensure education and training standards are met, and school leaders are generally highly professional. Reliable quality assurance processes are also in place. However, while financial resources in VET are managed efficiently, there remains a need to secure sufficient levels of funding to meet the core needs of VET providers. Additionally, there is room to strengthen the international exposure of both practitioners and students in VET.
Access to learning
Monitoring in the area of access to and participation to learning helps countries assess the extent to which initial VET, continuing VET and other learning opportunities are accessible and attractive to all learners, regardless of their individual backgrounds or reasons for participating. The data also reflects how well learners can expect to progress through and graduate from these learning opportunities.
The Torino Process is a regular review of national systems of vocational education and training as well as adult education. It is designed to analyse the ways in which national VET systems (including adult education) address the challenges of human capital development in a lifelong learning perspective. It was established by the European Training Foundation (ETF) in 2010 and has been carried out in partner countries in Southeastern Europe, Turkey, Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean ever since.
Monitoring in the context of the Torino Process describes the extent to which countries deliver on their commitments to learners in support of their learning through life (lifelong learning - LLL) in three major areas of policy and system performance: access to learning, quality of learning, and system organisation.
Quality of learning
Quality and relevance of learning is the area of monitoring that identifies how successfully the VET system provides basic skills and key competences to both young and adult learners. It highlights the relevance of VET programmes to the world of work and how effectively VET graduates transition into the labour market. Additionally, it monitors efforts to promote excellence across key domains, including pedagogy, professional development, programme content, governance, and social inclusion, as well as the openness of the VET system to innovation in response to the evolving needs of learners and labour markets.
Georgia has made notable progress in aligning VET with labour market demands, particularly through work-based learning initiatives and mandatory digitalisation. The introduction of dual learning models and legislative reforms strengthens the connection between learning and the world of work. Despite these efforts, however, employability remains a challenge due to gaps between the skills provided and those required by employers, like in many other countries. Ongoing reforms aim to address these gaps by improving the responsiveness of VET to external developments and labour market needs, as well as by promoting excellence and innovation. While digital competences are well integrated, there is still room for improvement in the inclusion of green skills.
System organisation
System organisation is the area of monitoring that captures performance across various domains of management and administration. It examines whether practitioners and leaders have access to data and evidence to support informed decision-making, the level of stakeholder involvement in VET governance, the quality and capacity of staff in leadership positions, and the degree of internationalisation. Additionally, monitoring the allocation of human and financial resources to the VET system helps assess whether these resources effectively support teaching, training, and learning.
VET in Georgia has both strengths and challenges in terms of organisation. While accountability and quality assurance mechanisms are well established, gaps remain in the involvement of external stakeholders and in the availability of data for informed decision-making. Efforts to improve teaching quality include new teacher policies focused on induction and continuous professional development. Financial resources are managed relatively efficiently, but further investment is needed to expand access to VET, particularly in underserved regions. Ongoing reforms, such as the creation of Skills Hubs and the introduction of sectoral partnerships, aim to address these issues and ensure the VET system remains responsive to the needs of learners and employers.
Promoting access and participation in opportunities for lifelong learning
Supporting quality and relevance of lifelong learning
Index of system performance
International comparability of performance results
In addition to messages about system performance, the Torino Process monitoring delivers information about the international comparability of results of each country, the extent to which these results may be susceptible to bias, and how self-critical a country is when it reports about its policy and system performance for external monitoring purposes. This is possible because the monitoring methodology foresees keeping accurate records about the availability, origin and type of evidence used to calculate the monitoring results for each country, including Georgia.
The monitoring results of Georgia are more internationally comparable than those of other countries participating in the Torino Process, on average. This means that internationally comparable data is somewhat more readily available. However, these monitoring results are also slightly more susceptible to bias as many are based on self-assessment. The combination of better international comparability and a heightened risk of bias suggests that while robust data exists in some areas, it is limited in others. Additionally, Georgia tends to rate the performance of its VET system more positively compared to other countries in this round of Torino Process monitoring.