Serbia 2023
Key takeaways
In Serbia, most young people choose vocational education, but this does not necessarily reflect its appeal. Rather, it highlights limited access to general education options. Adult learning, especially for women, faces greater challenges in terms of access and participation. However, policies linked to active labour market initiatives have been relatively effective in providing learning opportunities. Once enrolled, learners typically find an environment that supports their progress, completion, and movement between vocational and general education pathways. There does not appear to be significant discrimination in these transitions based on gender, socio-economic background, risk status, or country of origin.
The quality and relevance of skills gained through VET in Serbia vary by learner group. While young learners receive education that is slightly above average for Torino Process countries, adults tend to have stronger essential skills and competences needed for participation in information-rich societies. National authorities emphasise strong links between learning and work, supported by work-based learning and effective career guidance. Despite this, employability outcomes have not improved as expected, indicating the need for better support in this area. Although VET provides consistent quality across age and gender, disadvantaged youth and migrants seem to receive lower quality education, highlighting areas for improvement.
Serbia has more internationally comparable data than many other countries, but there is room to improve how this data is used. The VET system includes a wide range of quality assurance and accountability measures, though their effectiveness could be examined more closely. National authorities report active involvement of the private sector and other stakeholders in VET governance. There is also a strong focus on maintaining high professional standards when appointing school leaders, a challenge for many Torino Process countries. While Serbia is committed to staffing and financial investments in VET, improving the material resources available to providers remains a challenge, requiring more targeted funding.
Access to learning
Monitoring in the area of access to and participation to learning helps countries assess the extent to which initial VET, continuing VET and other learning opportunities are accessible and attractive to all learners, regardless of their individual backgrounds or reasons for participating. The data also reflects how well learners can expect to progress through and graduate from these learning opportunities.
The Torino Process is a regular review of national systems of vocational education and training as well as adult education. It is designed to analyse the ways in which national VET systems (including adult education) address the challenges of human capital development in a lifelong learning perspective. It was established by the European Training Foundation (ETF) in 2010 and has been carried out in partner countries in Southeastern Europe, Turkey, Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean ever since.
Monitoring in the context of the Torino Process describes the extent to which countries deliver on their commitments to learners in support of their learning through life (lifelong learning - LLL) in three major areas of policy and system performance: access to learning, quality of learning, and system organisation.
Quality of learning
Quality and relevance of learning is the area of monitoring that identifies how successfully the VET system provides basic skills and key competences to both young and adult learners. It highlights the relevance of VET programmes to the world of work and how effectively VET graduates transition into the labour market. Additionally, it monitors efforts to promote excellence across key domains, including pedagogy, professional development, programme content, governance, and social inclusion, as well as the openness of the VET system to innovation in response to the evolving needs of learners and labour markets.
Learning quality in VET in Serbia varies by learner group. Young students acquire basic skills at a level below the average of other countries and lower than the skills of adults. PISA data shows that learners in VET programmes score lower in mathematical literacy compared to their international peers, particularly those in three-year vocational tracks. Despite strong links between education and work, many VET graduates face challenges in finding employment due to gaps in job-specific skills and limited work experience. While VET raises awareness of green skills, students struggle to develop digital competences, and not all learners benefit equally from innovations in the system.
System organisation
System organisation is the area of monitoring that captures performance across various domains of management and administration. It examines whether practitioners and leaders have access to data and evidence to support informed decision-making, the level of stakeholder involvement in VET governance, the quality and capacity of staff in leadership positions, and the degree of internationalisation. Additionally, monitoring the allocation of human and financial resources to the VET system helps assess whether these resources effectively support teaching, training, and learning.
Promoting access and participation in opportunities for lifelong learning
Supporting quality and relevance of lifelong learning
Index of system performance
International comparability of performance results
In addition to messages about system performance, the Torino Process monitoring delivers information about the international comparability of results of each country, the extent to which these results may be susceptible to bias, and how self-critical a country is when it reports about its policy and system performance for external monitoring purposes. This is possible because the monitoring methodology foresees keeping accurate records about the availability, origin and type of evidence used to calculate the monitoring results for each country, including Serbia.
Among the countries participating in the Torino Process, Serbia has the most internationally comparable results on average, and these results are less prone to bias as many are based on quantitative data instead of self-assessment responses. However, Serbia tends to rate the performance of its VET system more positively than other countries do in this round of Torino Process monitoring.